January 2010
Monocle Magazine: A New Addition to Our Must-read List
January 2, 2010 | by Max IsraelI've made several references in the past to Tyler Brûlé's excellent magazine, Monocle. I’ve been a reader since their first issue and, after finishing their holiday issue, would like to recommend it to you as a must-read. Here’s why.
While it's true that we occasionally poke a bit of fun at Monocle's Affairs section, which can at times come off as a bit naïve, their unique view of retail, fashion, design and urban culture is really something worth reading.
Moreover, the book is a delight to take with you because, in part, of its form. Its delightfully designed pages are bound like a hefty trade paperback book, similar to Foreign Affairs.

Unlike most magazines, this one is something to experience over a few days. While recently on vacation in Madrid, for example, we lugged their Madrid City Guide around and found it to be packed with great insights on the city, its leading creative thinkers and places to stay, shop, eat and drink. (Several of the stores we visited had copies behind the counters as well.)
The magazine is a treat – and an expensive one at £75 pounds a year. It can be yours today for free, though. Drop me a note via the contact form on our website to say hello. I’ll pick a few winners at random next week and will have six month subscription delivered to your door, my treat.
Happy New Year
Max Israel
CEO | Customerville
The Top 3 Luxury Retailer's Rules for Feedback
January 5, 2010 | by Max Israel
Meet Your Toughest Competitor for the Next 10 Years
January 10, 2010 | by Max IsraelYour toughest competitor for the next 10 years isn’t going to be a rival brand, a new channel or a new technology. It’s the suddenly massive US household debt. The pain it will put Americans through as they divert spending to hack down their card balances will rob you of sales far more effectively than could any competitor. Here’s why – and how smart companies are preparing.
About once a quarter for the past five years, our own Joe Dion would walk into my office glowering at a chart a lot like the one below. The blue line on this chart represents US consumer debt as a percentage of GDP, and Joe was the earliest person I know to vocally warn that the logical end point of all this debt would be a rupture in our financial system along the lines of what we’ve recently experienced.
This week I’d like to share why we think you need to view the HHD number as your biggest competitor for the coming years, and adapt your business appropriately.

How did it get this bad? The last decade’s borrowing frenzy is an interesting story, but it happened largely in the background of our national consciousness until the financial meltdown in Q4 ‘08. (This American Life did an excellent wrap-up of the bank collapse – and how it relates to consumer debt – which I recommend.)
The story starts slowly. Household debt stayed pretty steady at under 50% of per capita GDP for most of the 20th century until the 80’s, when it started to climb. In recent years it rocketed out of control, and the consequences caused our economy to shudder. In a very real way, the global economic meltdown of the past year is a direct result of unhinged consumer borrowing hitting the red line.
In fact, US household debt is currently over 100% of per capita GDP, a level which we frequently hear economists regard as unsustainable.
Unlike consumer confidence or some other wishy-washy indicator, this one won’t change just because a few news cycles go by. Consumers might be shaking off the confidence-rattling effects of our economic crisis, but the fundamental causes have yet to be addressed. Americans have to make monthly payments on vastly more debt than they did in years past.
Household debt cannibalizes sales. Twice. So, American families are groaning under the weight of their payments. How does this impact you? The combination of maxed-out borrowing capacity robs sales – twice.
Consumers are deprived of the credit lines which financed a significant portion of their past purchases. Worse, paying down principal such that our debt levels return to what we can afford to service will require yet more cash from already anemic household budgets.
And an awful lot of that cash will come from one place – your sales.
Retention vs Acquisition. We’re seeing companies are responding to this change in a number of ways.
In the worst cases, I’ve seen companies whose strategies focus on a combination of discounting and hell-bent overhead slashing, with the goal of staying afloat “until the economy recovers”. The economy may well bounce back, but it won’t return to anything like it was before for a long time. This isn’t a strategy for the future.
The fittest companies we’ve met this year have adapted to the reality that their customer list is their most precious asset, and they’re guarding it carefully. They’ve retooled their marketing departments to make them as focused on customer retention as they are on its more sexy cousin – acquisition.
The defining competency of successful companies from retail to restaurants in the coming years will be their ability to constantly teach front-line employees the value of existing customers and how to stay close to them. Investments in feedback, social media and the training to make that information part and parcel of their employees’ day will be vital. This will enable them to remain approachable and relevant to customers through the coming years of paying down a great deal of debt.
Why We’re Not Fans of Net Promoter
January 22, 2010 | by Max IsraelNet Promoter has been a popular business metric for years. We understand the number’s appeal – it is a well thought-out and reliable predictor of sales growth. But it can fail your organization in one of the most critical ways.
Back before I was ever in the software-for-retailers business, I was simply in the retail business. I owned and operated a chain of retail stores.
One day I had the idea that it would be great to circulate a weekly memo to everyone in my company. I'd outline our goals for the week, celebrate victories, observe trends and champion ways to improve.
My first one weighed in at 3 pages, and included two charts and a photo. It looked like an advertisement for desktop publishing software. I was pretty proud of it. That is, of course, until I realized that none of my employees could recall anything I’d written.
Following weeks saw the editor’s knife, and after a few months what remained was a weekly one-paragraph memo of fewer than forty or fifty words. In 16-point type. Each memo focused on not more than one concept together with some employee attaboys. People read it, absorbed it and acted on it. My broader literary abilities would have to lay dormant, pretty much until you came along.
My lesson was that my front-line employees had their own daily routine and priorities, which are intimately connected to the substance of their daily job on the store floor. Absorbing bigger business concepts and incorporating that information into how they performed their jobs could only happen if I didn’t overload them with too much stuff. And the point where even very good employees tune-out is a lot lower than most managers realize.
The Problem with Net Promoter. Net Promoter, developed by consultant Frederick Reichheld, is a well thought-out and reliable predictor of sales growth. You calculate Net Promoter by applying a formula to the result of asking your customers to grade how likely they are to refer your organization to a friend or colleague.
But there’s a problem. Like version 1.0 of my employee memo, it is too complex to be used as a tool to coach the front lines of your organization.
To illustrate my point, try this two-part test. First, see if you can remember the formula for calculating Net Promoter off the top of your head. Over the years I’ve asked this question of a wide variety of people, and almost nobody can remember how to do it. It’s so unintuitive as to escape the memory of almost everyone.
Second, try to imagine yourself and your front-line managers explaining that formula to every new hourly emplooyee hired in your company, and including that explanation in every review and staff meeting occurring throughout your organization daily. It’s a formula for making eyes glaze over.
Let’s Remember Why We Measure. The goal of measuring customer experience isn’t just so you can know where you’re pleasing customers and where you’re not. It’s to enable your field teams to change their behavior such that the customer experience improves and, presumably, sales go up by virtue of improved retention. And that change requires enough simplicity that necessary actions are totally clear and can remain front-of-mind during your employees’ work day.
And the truth is that you don’t really sacrifice much by keeping it simple. It’s not clear to us that the complexity of Net Promoter yields you anything. When we compare store lists of our clients’ locations stack ranked by Net Promoter with, for example, a simple average grade on Recommend to a Friend those lists are remarkably similar.
Keeping it Simple. Though we generally ask the Recommend to a Friend question first, we always follow it with not more than a handful of the most actionable questions relating to the success of our client's business. And we always present the results to customer-facing employees in the simplest, clearest way possible. (Usually a simple 30-day average grade.) Employees waste no bandwidth trying to interpret what are clear, easy results.
Net Promoter might well have an application in your organization at the executive level. But when it comes to driving up performance where your customer-facing employees are concerned, we’d encourage you to employ a much simpler measure. Your employees will thank you.
Franchisors and Franchisees: Working It Out When Things Are Tough
January 22, 2010 | by Max IsraelThe franchisor-franchisee relationship is unlike any other in business. Franchisees are a unique hybrid of the franchisor’s customer and stakeholder, and yet they themselves have responsibility to the franchisor. Customer feedback provides an important piece of objectivity in troubleshooting that relationship.
I have an interesting view of the franchisor-franchisee relationship by virtue of the fact that Customerville works with franchise organizations all over the world. We see this remarkable relationship from both sides, both when things are really working well and when the relationship is under stress. Over the years we’ve seen several franchise organizations use customer feedback not only to drive sales, but also as an important tool for maintaining a healthy franchisor-franchisee relationship.
The Nature of the Relationship. Franchise relationships are based on the franchisor’s ability to package up an exciting offering in ways that enterprising franchisees can execute in local markets. This is a real two-way street. For every aspect of the business that the franchisor must communicate, the franchisee must execute every day when those doors open.
Franchisees can struggle for a variety of reasons, and it’s usually a combination of them. Some of these are operational reasons that can be fixed, but dealing with operational issues can get tense when the franchisee is also fighting against a broader trend such as the economy.
A drop in sales usually goes right to the bottom line. As any franchisee will tell you, he or she is usually the only person in the deal getting paid on spec. Everyone else – from franchisor to landlord to the tax man – is guaranteed to get paid.
And that can create tension, which we often see in erosion of goodwill between the franchisor and the one group of guys in the world who can help him when things are tough – his franchisor.
Customer feedback gives clarity. When we’ve seen franchisors and franchisees get their relationships and the businesses back on track, it usually seems to start with one or both parties taking a deep breath and looking around for objective information. This isn’t always easy because, frankly, a lot of franchisees don’t come into the deal with a ton of business experience. All too often, they start to feel like they’ve been sort of taken for a ride, which saps energy from fixing problems.
Looking back over, say, the past year’s customer grades – and how those grades benchmark against other franchisees in the region – can be a good starting place for dealing with that anxiety and moving the discussion in a productive direction. This is especially true if the franchise community had real buy-in on the questions which are used to gauge the customer experience. If the franchisee feels that the questions are actionable and realistic, he or she will look at them a lot more clearly. And an actionable list of things to fix can be a welcome antidote to stressful ambiguity.
You can teach a bear to dance. I once heard Gary Heil, a business advisor to retailers, say that you can teach a bear to dance, “but you’d better be ready to dance when the bear wants to.” This is true in this case, too. Not all elements of customer feedback point to shortcomings on the franchisee side. Franchisors in this discussion need to be ready to accept responsibility and take action when your customers express frustration about things only home office can fix.
Customer feedback can be a valuable tool for maintaining a healthy franchisor-franchisee relationship, and for putting that relationship back on track when things get stressed.
Contact Customerville
Call 1 (800) 330-GRADE
US: (800) 330-GRADE (4723)
Intl: +1 (206) 224-6200
General Information
Sales Questions
salesinquiry@customerville.com
Contact Max
Click here to ask Max a question



Follow us on Facebook